Skip to content

Academic Advisor

Monitor student progress and identify at-risk students

Enhances✓ Available Now

What You Do Today

Track academic performance, attendance, and engagement indicators across your caseload. Proactively reach out to students showing warning signs before they fail or drop out.

AI That Applies

AI early warning systems flag at-risk students using predictive models that combine grades, attendance, LMS engagement, and financial aid status. Prioritizes outreach by risk level.

Technologies

How It Works

The system ingests predictive models that combine grades as its primary data source. Predictive models weight dozens of input variables against historical outcomes, producing probability scores that rank cases by risk level. The output is a prioritized alert queue, with the highest-confidence findings surfaced first for immediate review.

What Changes

You catch struggling students weeks earlier. AI identifies risk patterns across hundreds of students that you couldn't monitor manually.

What Stays

Making the outreach call — and having the conversation that helps a struggling student find their way back — requires empathy, persistence, and counseling skill.

What To Do Next

This section won't tell you what your numbers should be. It will show you how to find them yourself. Every instruction below produces a real, verifiable result in your organization. No benchmarks, no projections — just the steps to build your own evidence.

1

Establish Your Baseline

Know where you are before you move

Before adopting AI tools for monitor student progress and identify at-risk students, understand your current state.

Map your current process: Document how monitor student progress and identify at-risk students works today — who does what, how long it takes, where the bottlenecks are. You need this baseline to measure improvement.
Identify the judgment points: Making the outreach call — and having the conversation that helps a struggling student find their way back — requires empathy, persistence, and counseling skill. These are the boundaries AI won't cross.
Assess your data readiness: AI tools for this area need data to work. Check whether your organization has the historical data, integrations, and data quality to support early alert systems tools.

Without a baseline, you can't measure whether AI actually improved anything. You'll adopt tools without knowing if they're working.

2

Define Your Measures

What to track and how to calculate it

Time per cycle

How to calculate

Measure how long monitor student progress and identify at-risk students takes end-to-end today, then after AI adoption.

Why it matters

The most visible improvement is speed. If AI doesn't save time, question whether it's adding value.

Quality of output

How to calculate

Track error rates, rework frequency, or stakeholder satisfaction scores before and after.

Why it matters

Speed without quality is just faster mistakes. Measure both.

When to check: Check after 30 days of consistent use, then quarterly.
The commitment: Give new tools at least 30 days before judging. The first week is always awkward.
What NOT to measure: Don't measure AI adoption rate as a KPI. Adoption follows value — if the tool helps, people use it.
3

Start These Conversations

Who to talk to and what to ask

your department chair or principal

What's our current false positive rate, and how much analyst time does that consume?

They influence which ed-tech tools get approved and funded

your instructional technologist

Which risk scenarios do we not monitor today because we don't have the capacity?

They support the tech stack and can show you capabilities you don't know exist

4

Check Your Prerequisites

Confirm readiness before you invest

Check items as you confirm them.