Skip to content

Loss Control Engineer

Perform catastrophe risk evaluations

Enhances✓ Available Now

What You Do Today

You assess properties for earthquake, wind, flood, and wildfire exposure, evaluating construction quality, secondary hazards, and business continuity preparedness.

AI That Applies

AI integrates satellite imagery, climate models, and catastrophe modeling outputs to provide detailed exposure assessments for individual properties and portfolios.

Technologies

How It Works

The system pulls operational data and maps it against risk frameworks, control requirements, and historical incident patterns. Computer vision models analyze the visual input by detecting objects, measuring spatial relationships, and comparing against trained reference patterns to identify matches or anomalies. The output — detailed exposure assessments for individual properties and portfolios — surfaces in the existing workflow where the practitioner can review and act on it.

What Changes

CAT exposure assessments become more granular when AI layers climate projections, building characteristics, and historical event data.

What Stays

Your on-the-ground assessment of whether this specific building will actually survive a Category 3 hurricane — models give probabilities, you give engineering reality.

What To Do Next

This section won't tell you what your numbers should be. It will show you how to find them yourself. Every instruction below produces a real, verifiable result in your organization. No benchmarks, no projections — just the steps to build your own evidence.

1

Establish Your Baseline

Know where you are before you move

Before adopting AI tools for perform catastrophe risk evaluations, understand your current state.

Map your current process: Document how perform catastrophe risk evaluations works today — who does what, how long it takes, where the bottlenecks are. You need this baseline to measure improvement.
Identify the judgment points: Your on-the-ground assessment of whether this specific building will actually survive a Category 3 hurricane — models give probabilities, you give engineering reality. These are the boundaries AI won't cross.
Assess your data readiness: AI tools for this area need data to work. Check whether your organization has the historical data, integrations, and data quality to support Catastrophe Modeling tools.

Without a baseline, you can't measure whether AI actually improved anything. You'll adopt tools without knowing if they're working.

2

Define Your Measures

What to track and how to calculate it

Time per cycle

How to calculate

Measure how long perform catastrophe risk evaluations takes end-to-end today, then after AI adoption.

Why it matters

The most visible improvement is speed. If AI doesn't save time, question whether it's adding value.

Quality of output

How to calculate

Track error rates, rework frequency, or stakeholder satisfaction scores before and after.

Why it matters

Speed without quality is just faster mistakes. Measure both.

When to check: Check after 30 days of consistent use, then quarterly.
The commitment: Give new tools at least 30 days before judging. The first week is always awkward.
What NOT to measure: Don't measure AI adoption rate as a KPI. Adoption follows value — if the tool helps, people use it.
3

Start These Conversations

Who to talk to and what to ask

your claims director or VP Claims

What would have to be true about our data quality for AI to work reliably in perform catastrophe risk evaluations?

They're setting the automation strategy for your unit

your SIU lead

What would a pilot look like for AI in perform catastrophe risk evaluations — smallest possible test that would tell us something?

AI fraud detection changes how investigations are triggered and prioritized

4

Check Your Prerequisites

Confirm readiness before you invest

Check items as you confirm them.