Skip to content

Physician

Prior Authorization Management

Automates✓ Available Now

What You Do Today

Fight with insurance companies to get approval for medications, procedures, and imaging that your patient needs. You're filling out forms, writing letters of medical necessity, and waiting on hold — time that could be spent on patient care.

AI That Applies

AI that auto-generates prior authorization submissions from clinical documentation, predicts approval probability, and routes denials to appeal workflows with pre-drafted clinical justifications.

Technologies

How It Works

The system ingests clinical documentation as its primary data source. Predictive models fit to historical outcome data identify which variables are the strongest leading indicators, then apply those weights to current inputs to generate forward-looking scores. The output — prior authorization submissions from clinical documentation — surfaces in the existing workflow where the practitioner can review and act on it.

What Changes

Prior auth submissions generate from the chart — the AI extracts the clinical justification and populates the payer's form. Denial appeals draft automatically from the documentation.

What Stays

Peer-to-peer reviews. When the payer wants to speak to a physician, that's a physician-to-physician conversation about clinical judgment. The AI handles the paperwork; you handle the argument.

What To Do Next

This section won't tell you what your numbers should be. It will show you how to find them yourself. Every instruction below produces a real, verifiable result in your organization. No benchmarks, no projections — just the steps to build your own evidence.

1

Establish Your Baseline

Know where you are before you move

Before adopting AI tools for prior authorization management, understand your current state.

Map your current process: Document how prior authorization management works today — who does what, how long it takes, where the bottlenecks are. You need this baseline to measure improvement.
Identify the judgment points: Peer-to-peer reviews. These are the boundaries AI won't cross.
Assess your data readiness: AI tools for this area need data to work. Check whether your organization has the historical data, integrations, and data quality to support NLP tools.

Without a baseline, you can't measure whether AI actually improved anything. You'll adopt tools without knowing if they're working.

2

Define Your Measures

What to track and how to calculate it

Time per cycle

How to calculate

Measure how long prior authorization management takes end-to-end today, then after AI adoption.

Why it matters

The most visible improvement is speed. If AI doesn't save time, question whether it's adding value.

Quality of output

How to calculate

Track error rates, rework frequency, or stakeholder satisfaction scores before and after.

Why it matters

Speed without quality is just faster mistakes. Measure both.

When to check: Check after 30 days of consistent use, then quarterly.
The commitment: Give new tools at least 30 days before judging. The first week is always awkward.
What NOT to measure: Don't measure AI adoption rate as a KPI. Adoption follows value — if the tool helps, people use it.
3

Start These Conversations

Who to talk to and what to ask

your department medical director

What data do we already have that could improve how we handle prior authorization management?

They set clinical practice guidelines that AI tools must align with

your health informatics lead

Who on our team has the deepest experience with prior authorization management, and what tools are they already using?

They manage the EHR integrations and clinical decision support configuration

a nurse informaticist

If we brought in AI tools for prior authorization management, what would we measure before and after to know it actually helped?

They bridge the gap between clinical workflow and technology implementation

4

Check Your Prerequisites

Confirm readiness before you invest

Check items as you confirm them.