Skip to content

Utility Planner

Analyzing reliability and risk

Enhances✓ Available Now

What You Do Today

Assess system reliability under various scenarios — loss of key facilities, extreme weather, fuel supply disruptions. Ensure the system can handle foreseeable stress events.

AI That Applies

AI runs probabilistic reliability assessments across thousands of scenarios, identifies the combinations of events that create system risk, and quantifies the reliability impact of investments.

Technologies

How It Works

The system pulls operational data and maps it against risk frameworks, control requirements, and historical incident patterns. The simulation engine runs thousands of scenarios by varying each uncertain input across its probability range, building a distribution of outcomes that quantifies the risk. The results integrate into the practitioner's existing workflow — presenting recommendations, flags, or automated outputs alongside their normal working context.

What Changes

Reliability analysis is probabilistic and comprehensive. AI evaluates correlated risk (like extreme cold affecting both gas supply and load simultaneously).

What Stays

Determining acceptable risk levels and designing solutions for extreme scenarios. Reliability is ultimately about judgment — how much risk is too much?

What To Do Next

This section won't tell you what your numbers should be. It will show you how to find them yourself. Every instruction below produces a real, verifiable result in your organization. No benchmarks, no projections — just the steps to build your own evidence.

1

Establish Your Baseline

Know where you are before you move

Before adopting AI tools for analyzing reliability and risk, understand your current state.

Map your current process: Document how analyzing reliability and risk works today — who does what, how long it takes, where the bottlenecks are. You need this baseline to measure improvement.
Identify the judgment points: Determining acceptable risk levels and designing solutions for extreme scenarios. These are the boundaries AI won't cross.
Assess your data readiness: AI tools for this area need data to work. Check whether your organization has the historical data, integrations, and data quality to support reliability assessment tools tools.

Without a baseline, you can't measure whether AI actually improved anything. You'll adopt tools without knowing if they're working.

2

Define Your Measures

What to track and how to calculate it

Time per cycle

How to calculate

Measure how long analyzing reliability and risk takes end-to-end today, then after AI adoption.

Why it matters

The most visible improvement is speed. If AI doesn't save time, question whether it's adding value.

Quality of output

How to calculate

Track error rates, rework frequency, or stakeholder satisfaction scores before and after.

Why it matters

Speed without quality is just faster mistakes. Measure both.

When to check: Check after 30 days of consistent use, then quarterly.
The commitment: Give new tools at least 30 days before judging. The first week is always awkward.
What NOT to measure: Don't measure AI adoption rate as a KPI. Adoption follows value — if the tool helps, people use it.
3

Start These Conversations

Who to talk to and what to ask

your VP Operations or COO

What's our current false positive rate, and how much analyst time does that consume?

They're prioritizing which operational processes to automate

your process improvement or lean lead

Which risk scenarios do we not monitor today because we don't have the capacity?

They understand the workflow dependencies that AI tools need to respect

4

Check Your Prerequisites

Confirm readiness before you invest

Check items as you confirm them.