Skip to content

VP Regulatory Affairs

Expert witness and hearing preparation

Enhances◐ 1–3 years

What You Do Today

Prepare for and participate in evidentiary hearings. Coach company witnesses for cross-examination, prepare redirect questions, and manage the hearing room dynamic to present the strongest case.

AI That Applies

AI analyzes opposing testimony to identify weaknesses, generates potential cross-examination questions, and helps prepare rebuttable points based on data inconsistencies.

Technologies

How It Works

The system ingests opposing testimony to identify weaknesses as its primary data source. The processing layer applies the appropriate analytical models to the structured data, generating scored outputs that surface the most actionable insights. The output — potential cross-examination questions — surfaces in the existing workflow where the practitioner can review and act on it.

What Changes

Opposing testimony analysis becomes faster and more thorough with AI-assisted inconsistency detection.

What Stays

Cross-examination strategy, witness coaching, hearing room advocacy, and the real-time judgment calls that determine hearing outcomes.

What To Do Next

This section won't tell you what your numbers should be. It will show you how to find them yourself. Every instruction below produces a real, verifiable result in your organization. No benchmarks, no projections — just the steps to build your own evidence.

1

Establish Your Baseline

Know where you are before you move

Before adopting AI tools for expert witness and hearing preparation, understand your current state.

Map your current process: Document how expert witness and hearing preparation works today — who does what, how long it takes, where the bottlenecks are. You need this baseline to measure improvement.
Identify the judgment points: Cross-examination strategy, witness coaching, hearing room advocacy, and the real-time judgment calls that determine hearing outcomes. These are the boundaries AI won't cross.
Assess your data readiness: AI tools for this area need data to work. Check whether your organization has the historical data, integrations, and data quality to support Westlaw tools.

Without a baseline, you can't measure whether AI actually improved anything. You'll adopt tools without knowing if they're working.

2

Define Your Measures

What to track and how to calculate it

Time per cycle

How to calculate

Measure how long expert witness and hearing preparation takes end-to-end today, then after AI adoption.

Why it matters

The most visible improvement is speed. If AI doesn't save time, question whether it's adding value.

Quality of output

How to calculate

Track error rates, rework frequency, or stakeholder satisfaction scores before and after.

Why it matters

Speed without quality is just faster mistakes. Measure both.

When to check: Check after 30 days of consistent use, then quarterly.
The commitment: Give new tools at least 30 days before judging. The first week is always awkward.
What NOT to measure: Don't measure AI adoption rate as a KPI. Adoption follows value — if the tool helps, people use it.
3

Start These Conversations

Who to talk to and what to ask

your board chair or lead independent director

What data do we already have that could improve how we handle expert witness and hearing preparation?

They shape expectations for how AI appears in governance

your CTO or CIO

Who on our team has the deepest experience with expert witness and hearing preparation, and what tools are they already using?

They own the technology infrastructure that enables AI adoption

a peer executive at a company further along on AI adoption

If we brought in AI tools for expert witness and hearing preparation, what would we measure before and after to know it actually helped?

Their lessons learned are worth more than any consultant's framework

4

Check Your Prerequisites

Confirm readiness before you invest

Check items as you confirm them.